AutoCalcAutoCalc
AutoCalc Academy

Module 7 of 8 · 8 min read

Investors and existing property

Rental shading, how existing loans are tested and negative gearing produce the widest gaps of all.

Everything in the earlier modules applies to investors, only more of it. They have more income streams to shade, more loans to test and more tax effects to account for. That's why the widest gaps between lenders show up on investor deals, and why they reward the broker who understands where each one comes from.

Rent: shaded, then sometimes capped

Lenders typically count 70% to 80% of gross rent to allow for vacancies, agent fees, rates and maintenance. Some vary that by property type or location, cut it further for short-term or holiday letting, or count nothing for unusual properties.

The big one: how existing loans are tested

This is where lenders split furthest. Some count an existing investment loan at the repayment the client actually pays today. Others re-test its balance at their own assessment rate (around 9%) as though it were a new loan. For a client with three or four investment loans the difference runs into thousands of dollars a month.

Try it

One investment property, two ways to test it

$550,000
$3,400
$600
Share of rent counted
At the actual repayment
$1,320 a month
net cost after $2,080 of rent counted
At a buffered repayment
$2,345 a month
$4,425 tested, less the same rent

The difference, $1,025 a month, is roughly $127,000 of new borrowing, for one property. Investors with three or four multiply it.

"Buffered" tests the balance at 9% over a fresh 30 years. Rent shown before tax. Negative gearing benefits are left out here and covered in the text.

Negative gearing

When an investment property costs more to hold than it earns, the loss reduces the owner's taxable income, so they pay less tax. Some lenders add that tax saving back into the client's income; others ignore it. The rules for how investment losses are taxed can change, and lenders update their treatment when they do, so check the current position for each lender rather than assuming.

Debt-to-income caps

Even when the surplus works, lenders also look at total debt as a multiple of gross income. Many limit lending at high multiples (often somewhere between 6 and 9 times income), or send those deals for extra review, and the regulator watches lending at six times income or more closely. Investors with large portfolios reach this limit first.

Case study
The couple with two investment properties
Applicants
A couple, one child
Salaries
$150,000 and $95,000
Home
$520,000 owing
Two investment properties
$1.06M owing; rent $1,160 a week
New purchase
A third investment property, rent $650 a week
Declared living costs
$4,200 a month
Lowest
$171k
Middle lender
$439k
Highest
$1.10M
Gap
$930k
Maximum borrowing, 27 lenders This borrower
  1. Lender 2$171k
  2. Lender 4$193k
  3. Lender 8$193k
  4. Lender 17$193k
  5. Lender 3$193k
  6. Lender 9$273k
  7. Lender 16$274k
  8. Lender 6$285k
  9. Lender 20$352k
  10. Lender 12$369k
  11. Lender 25$370k
  12. Lender 5$421k
  13. Lender 10$438k
  14. Lender 21$439k
  15. Lender 13$451k
  16. Lender 23$456k
  17. Lender 15$478k
  18. Lender 18$509k
  19. Lender 24$545k
  20. Lender 11$574k
  21. Lender 14$624k
  22. Lender 26$630k
  23. Lender 27$679k
  24. Lender 7$736k
  25. Lender 1$800k
  26. Lender 22$811k
  27. Lender 19$1.10M
The most generous lender lends 6.4 times as much as the least generous. Figures from each lender's serviceability calculator as rebuilt in AutoCalc, run on 22 Oct 2026. Lenders are unnamed, and the numbers are reshuffled for every case study. Rates and policy change often, so treat these as an illustration, not a quote.

From $171k to $1.10M for the same couple. That isn't a typo, and it isn't unusual for investors. Every lever in this module is at work at once: how much of the rent counts, whether the three existing loans are tested at what the couple actually pays or re-tested at the lender's rate, what credit the tax effects get, and which living-expense figure applies to the household. Each lender pulls them in its own combination. Most sit in the middle, around $439k.

Takeaways

  • Rent is usually counted at 70% to 80%, with cuts for some property types and short-term letting.
  • Whether existing loans are tested at the actual repayment or re-tested at the lender's rate is the biggest single swing.
  • Some lenders credit the tax benefit of negative gearing; others don't.
  • Debt-to-income limits can stop an investor even when the surplus works.

Check your understanding

0 of 3 answered
  1. 1. An investor's existing loan has a $600,000 balance and costs $3,500 a month. Lender X tests it at $3,500. Lender Y re-tests the balance at 9% over 30 years. Which counts the higher repayment?

  2. 2. What does 'negative gearing' add back at the lenders that credit it?

  3. 3. An investor's surplus is positive at a lender, but the deal is declined. What's a likely cause?